LWP output encoding

[Struan Donald]

* at 23/11 16:01 +0000 Andy Armstrong said:
> On 23 Nov 2005, at 15:03, Struan Donald wrote:
> >I am sure someone who understands more about this will be along to
> >explain why this is not a good idea...
> 
> I think it's a fine idea. I should have expressed myself more clearly  
> - I don't /just/ need the hash of the content - I need to know what  
> encoding it's using so I can store and subsequently display it  
> correctly.

ah.

I gave up on that as there didn't seem to be a reliable way of doing
that. If you find one I'd love to know.

s