Hash parsing considered ugly
Jonathan McKeown
jonathan at hst.org.za
Sun Feb 26 20:00:45 GMT 2006
On Sunday 26 February 2006 00:27, drkjam wrote:
> my %h = (
> foo => 1,
> foo => 2,
[leads to %h being ( foo => 2 )]
> Is there any way at all to get Perl to flag this with at least some form
> of warning?
Why? Consider:
sub blah {
my %defaults = ( foo => 17, bar => 23, baz => 42 );
my %args = ( %defaults, @_ );
......
}
.... and later ....
blah( bar => 666 );
Do you really want a warning generated because you've provided a non-default
value for one of blah()'s arguments?
Jonathan
More information about the london.pm
mailing list