Devel::LeakTrace

[Andy Armstrong]

On 1 Mar 2006, at 13:29, Nigel Rantor wrote:
> Well, look, why not just wait until Rich has some bandwidth to get  
> back to you. He may say "take over number one", in which case you  
> have just volunteered yourself. Otherwise he'll accept patches in  
> which case everything is groovy and you don't have to pick up a  
> maint hat for a module.
>
> Failing that if you think the amount of code that you would retain  
> is so minimal then just release your code under a different name...  
> Devel::TraceLeak perhaps? ;-)

Yes, thanks - I think that all amounts to a splendid plan :)

-- 
Andy Armstrong, hexten.net