ora owns web2.0 - and will sue your ass if you try to use it

[David Landgren]

Jonathan Stowe wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 06:12, Nigel Hamilton wrote:
>>> So this is no more ridiculous than what we already have with O'Reilly
>>> protecting the Perl camel,
>> It's the ORA camel not the Perl camel ... that's one problem.
>>
> 
> Yes, it's the cover of a book that they published, I've never quite
> understood why anyone thought it should be "the Perl camel".

And besides, the logo (non-commercial, non-profit, non-whatever) of Perl 
is an onion.


-- 
hope still, a little resistance always maybe stubborn tiny lights vs. 
clustering darkness forever ok?