BerkeleyDB locking subsystem
abuse at cabal.org.uk
Mon Jul 31 16:09:28 BST 2006
On 31 Jul 2006, at 15:41, Thomas Busch wrote:
> Is there any way to avoid locking altogether when using concurrent
> access to a BerkeleyDB, so that a crash of a process wouldn't affect
> the BerkeleyDB ? If not is there a way to let locks expire. And if
> this doesn't work what are my alternatives.
Concurrent access to a data store that remains consistent and
uncorrupted even in the face of unreliable/untrusted clients does
rather suggest a real database to me.
More information about the london.pm