the "no good Perl jobs"/"no good Perl programmers" myth
adrianh at quietstars.com
Mon Aug 7 16:02:12 BST 2006
On 7 Aug 2006, at 15:47, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 03:41:51PM +0100, Adrian Howard wrote:
>> a) it costs money to train folk, and many companies seem keener to
>> change platform/language than spend that money.
> As if changing platform doesn't cost money? Or is it that you can't
> quantify it, therefore it can be assumed to be zero, even if it's not?
I never said it was a sensible decision ;-)
It is a pattern I've seen again and again though. About the only
exception being various Large Financial Institutions (who in one
instance that I know of have an in-house compiler team to keep their
local language-of-choice going :-)
>> b) the smart programmers coming straight out of university don't want
>> to learn Perl
> Why don't they want to learn it? Because other technology seems
> new, hip and
Yeah. I think that's a fair summary (and in some instances s/seems/is/).
More information about the london.pm