Disclaimers

[Dominic Mitchell]

Roger Burton West wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 05:36:29PM +0100, Peter Corlett wrote:
> 
>> Is this the new way to make those tedious and unenforcable "disclaimers" even 
>> more annoying?
> 
> I believe there's already been at least one case in which the disclaimer
> was held to be invalid _precisely because_ it was blindly attached to
> every bit of mail without human intervention.

I seem to recall that the disclaimers aren't necessarily there for any 
legal purpose so much as being a requirement of the business 
insurance...  Ah yes, this was it.

   http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2003/04/08/BottomHeavy

-Dom