dom at happygiraffe.net
Wed Aug 16 21:57:21 BST 2006
Roger Burton West wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 05:36:29PM +0100, Peter Corlett wrote:
>> Is this the new way to make those tedious and unenforcable "disclaimers" even
>> more annoying?
> I believe there's already been at least one case in which the disclaimer
> was held to be invalid _precisely because_ it was blindly attached to
> every bit of mail without human intervention.
I seem to recall that the disclaimers aren't necessarily there for any
legal purpose so much as being a requirement of the business
insurance... Ah yes, this was it.
More information about the london.pm