Simultaneous multiple module versions

[Matt S Trout]

Nicholas Clark wrote:
> It's not a "fix", as it fixes a real bug, and not a Class::DBI specific bug.

Your version I consider a bugfix. Red Hat's dumbass backport to a version that 
can't handle it properly and where everybody expects to have to work around 
the damn bug anyway gets the quote marks.

> No-one's reported the performance hit upstream, let alone with a demonstration
> case that uses only core modules. Is anyone surprised that there's been
> no response?

Is any response required from you? This isn't in the real perl, only a 
specific mutant Red Hat one, so I figured it was their problem, not yours.

> london.pm list isn't the right place either.

hates-software or possibly the as yet nonexistent sodding-distro-perl-maints 
list might be more appropriate, but I feel there's a fair degree of overlap to 
here provided you take as read the fact that I was bitching rather than 
attempting to do anything constructive - given they've already said the patch 
stays there doesn't seem much constructive left to do.

-- 
      Matt S Trout       Offering custom development, consultancy and support
   Technical Director    contracts for Catalyst, DBIx::Class and BAST. Contact
Shadowcat Systems Ltd.  mst (at) shadowcatsystems.co.uk for more information

+ Help us build a better perl ORM: http://dbix-class.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/ +