Should exist, but probably doesn't (2)

Andy Armstrong andy at
Thu Dec 7 21:14:25 GMT 2006

On 7 Dec 2006, at 20:37, ti at wrote:
> Well, it IS "launch a bunch of async jobs". The possibly novel bit  
> is that
> the application code doesn't need to know it's running an async job at
> all.

I reckon I'm missing something :)

So does the main thread / process / whatever get an async  
notification when one of the workers completes? Like a signal perhaps?

Andy Armstrong,

More information about the mailing list