Adrian Howard adrianh at
Wed Jan 17 14:23:57 GMT 2007

On 17 Jan 2007, at 13:36, chromatic wrote:
> 2) can() is a method.  Methods aren't functions.  If you call a  
> method as a
> function, you've introduced unreliability into everyone's code  
> again, and of
> course things will break.

More like a retconned method :-)

Personally I don't blame people for doing what the documentation said  
they could do for the last N years...


More information about the mailing list