@+ magic variable
Simon Wilcox
essuu at ourshack.com
Thu Feb 15 15:22:01 GMT 2007
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Luis Motta Campos wrote:
> Of course not.
> You're interpolating an (empty) array named @+, that is not
> special, but stills an array.
> I don't see any reason for perl warnings annoyance.
Paul's original point is that it behaves differently on 5.6.1 from 5.8.4.
In 5.6.1 s/@+$// appears to match a literal @ when we'd expect it not to.
Note that @+ is a special variable according to perlvar.
Simon.
More information about the london.pm
mailing list