Devel::Cover recommendations... or maybe not?

[Dirk Koopman]

Richard Jolly wrote:
> london.pm-bounces at london.pm.org wrote:
>>    Dear Londoners, I need to recommend some tools for QA at $company.
>>
>>    Maybe some of you can tell me good (or bad) impressions
>> about Devel::Cover.
>>
>>    The POD scares everybody, stating clearly "this is alfa code".
>> It's almost like saying "go away" what is pretty strange for
>> an open- source module...
>>
>>    Comments, anybody?
> 
> show them what it does: 
>  
>   http://pjcj.sytes.net/cpancover/
> 

Is it just me, or should more people be concerned that the Test::* 
coverage is rather less than 100%?