[OT] perl and CLRs

[Nicholas Clark]

On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 12:49:05PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:

> You seem to contradict yourself here slightly.
> Your statement implies that if Perl *were* available for .NET and JVM
> (which is a logical extension of porting to .NET alone, albeit 75% more
> work) then people might also play with Ruby.

Oh, I mean Perl. As in "Perl too". Obviously. D'oh.
Spell checkers don't catch those sort of mistakes.

Nicholas Clark