[OT] perl and CLRs
nick at ccl4.org
Wed May 2 12:55:01 BST 2007
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 12:49:05PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> You seem to contradict yourself here slightly.
> Your statement implies that if Perl *were* available for .NET and JVM
> (which is a logical extension of porting to .NET alone, albeit 75% more
> work) then people might also play with Ruby.
Oh, I mean Perl. As in "Perl too". Obviously. D'oh.
Spell checkers don't catch those sort of mistakes.
More information about the london.pm