dom at happygiraffe.net
Sat May 12 12:32:48 BST 2007
Matt S Trout wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 11:36:05AM -0700, chromatic wrote:
>> On Friday 11 May 2007 08:58:51 Peter Corlett wrote:
>>> Sure C has objects. They're just called structs, that's all.
>> Sure C has types. They're just the number of bits you can read or write
>> before crashing, that's all.
> You should get yourself a copy of TCP/IP Illustrated Volume 2 and look at
> how the old BSD stack used structs to provide N sets of functions pointers
> to implement the interface per network device type. Bar the lack of mutability
> of the keys it's not vastly unlike a package symbol table, at least in terms
> of -conceptualisation- of OO.
Alternative example: X toolkit intrinsics. Don't ask me how the hell it
works, I took one look at the description and ran away screaming. But I
did see that it used structs as objects in C.
More information about the london.pm