[OT] E-mail provider recommendations

Stig Brautaset stig at brautaset.org
Sun Jul 22 10:59:10 BST 2007

On 22 Jul 2007, at 01:29, Robert Rothenberg wrote:
> * Allows me to send e-mails with alternative from addresses (so I  
> can have
>   other accounts forward to this one, but reply as the original  
> address).
> * Allows me to send/receive large attachments.
> * A decent webmail interface.
> * POP/IMAP and SMTP (over SSL).
> * Tolerable spam filtering.
> * Reliable uptime/server performance.
> * No bizarro service agreements about the kinds of e-mail I can  
> send or
>   receive (beyond the usual restrictions against spamming).
> I'm fine with paying for the service--- I'd rather rely on a  
> company whose
> services I pay for than on one which is giving it away for "free".




More information about the london.pm mailing list