Poker (was Re: NLP)

Nigel Rantor wiggly at
Tue Sep 18 16:37:20 BST 2007

Zach Vonler wrote:
> On 9/18/07, Paul Makepeace <paulm at> wrote:
>> Here's another that is a bit less than obvious. You've got 78 and the
>> board come 783 giving you two pair. I have JJ. At this point you think
>> you're looking pretty good.
> Why did the player holding 78 pay to see the flop, given the raise the
> player holding JJ should have made?


who knows, maybe he (JJ) was UTG and had 7 people behind him and only 
limped or min-raised?

so, are we going to get an LPM poker night together or what?


More information about the mailing list