easy introduction to perl
nicg at noslogan.org
Fri Oct 5 12:54:35 BST 2007
On 05/10/2007, Adrian Howard <adrianh at quietstars.com> wrote:
> On 5 Oct 2007, at 12:00, Nic Gibson wrote:
> >> This may be slightly contrarian - but I have personally found it
> >> easier to introduce references/objects earlier rather than later.
> >> Especially if folk have experience in other programming languages.
> > I think *only* if they have experience.
> Yeah... not so sure about that myself... I don't think OO is actually
> as difficult for newbies as many folk think it is. Especially if you
> can give people a framework to start with.
No, OO isn't that hard for newbies. In the past I've found it easier
to explain OO to non-programmers than to experienced procedural
programmers (we're talking 15 years ago here when it wasn't hard to
find someone who was an experienced programmer with absolutely no
exposure to OO).
> Oh year - I introduce testing right from the start too. Pairing & TDD
> is a _really_ nice way to introduce languages.
I think 'near the start' would be good but there is a level of
expertise one needs before one can actually write a meaningful test.
Some of the folks I've taught on intro to perl courses need the first
two days before they could have a chance of writing a test. However,
we do pair people immediately (as anyone who's done an LT course and
ended up sat with someone truly weird will know).
Director, Corbas Consulting
Editorial and Technical Consultancy
More information about the london.pm