Benchmark results (was easy introduction to perl)
davehodg at gmail.com
Sun Oct 7 22:34:52 BST 2007
On 7 Oct 2007, at 23:15, Lyle - CosmicPerl.com wrote:
> Jonathan Rockway wrote:
>> I think Ash's point was that many perl people are moving away from
>> CGI.pm and are using more advanced tools like Mason, Catalyst, Jifty,
>> and CGI::Application.
> While looking at some benchmarking for Perl, PHP, ASP, etc, I came
> across some results that mentioned Mason, and has certainly put me
> off it!
What's more expensive, computer time or programmer time?
> Not saying
> CGI.pm did any better, lol. Although I've only every used CGI.pm
> for browser file uploads and not for generating HTML. I've always
> used my own HTML routines, I was thinking about changing it all to
> template toolkit, but looking at the memory overhead I think I
> might stick with my own stuff...
What memory overhead?
Back in the Market Risk swamp
More information about the london.pm