Benchmark results (was easy introduction to perl)
jesse at fsck.com
Sun Oct 7 22:54:16 BST 2007
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 10:15:15PM +0100, Lyle - CosmicPerl.com wrote:
> Jonathan Rockway wrote:
> >I think Ash's point was that many perl people are moving away from plain
> >CGI.pm and are using more advanced tools like Mason, Catalyst, Jifty,
> >and CGI::Application.
> While looking at some benchmarking for Perl, PHP, ASP, etc, I came
> across some results that mentioned Mason, and has certainly put me off it!
It doesn't suggest that they knew enough about mason to turn off the
"development mode" features. But the test suite is definitely good for a
> Not saying
> CGI.pm did any better, lol. Although I've only every used CGI.pm for
> browser file uploads and not for generating HTML. I've always used my
> own HTML routines, I was thinking about changing it all to template
> toolkit, but looking at the memory overhead I think I might stick with
> my own stuff...
More information about the london.pm