Does Microsoft like Perl and PHP?

Matt S Trout dbix-class at trout.me.uk
Tue Oct 16 19:08:43 BST 2007


On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 12:41:16PM +0100, Lyle - CosmicPerl.com wrote:
> Paul LeoNerd Evans wrote:
> >On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 23:28:42 +0100
> >Chisel Wright <chisel at herlpacker.co.uk> wrote:
> >  
> >I am tempted to blame, at least partially, the MUA's UI.
> >
> >I challenge you to name me a single MUA that displays, in any way, the
> >"References" or "In-Reply-To" fields by default, when composing a reply.
> >Normally, the reply looks exactly the same as a new message, with some
> >"to" and "subject" line. The uninitiated user cannot visually distinguish
> >a new message with a filled-in "to" line, and a reply with the "subject"
> >deleted - to him, he cannot see that the former is different from the
> >latter, that the latter also stores refs/in-reply-to that will break
> >threading.
> >  
> Here, here.

If you can't remember whether you clicked 'new' or 'reply' to start the
current message you need to lay off the drugs.

Even -I- can still bloody remember that.

-- 
      Matt S Trout       Need help with your Catalyst or DBIx::Class project?
   Technical Director                    http://www.shadowcat.co.uk/catalyst/
 Shadowcat Systems Ltd.  Want a managed development or deployment platform?
http://chainsawblues.vox.com/            http://www.shadowcat.co.uk/servers/


More information about the london.pm mailing list