Bristol/Bath.pm (was Re: Perl 6?)
aaron.trevena at gmail.com
Wed Oct 17 11:56:16 BST 2007
On 17/10/2007, Dave Cross <dave at dave.org.uk> wrote:
> Quoting Aaron Trevena <aaron.trevena at gmail.com>:
> > On 17/10/2007, Peter Haworth <pmh at edison.ioppublishing.com> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 18:29:12 +0100, Lyle - CosmicPerl.com wrote:
> >> > David Cantrell wrote:
> >> > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 02:16:12AM +0100, Lyle - CosmicPerl.com
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > > At the moment my beyond work Perl time is being spent setting up
> >> > > > a local Perl M[ou]ngers group ...
> >> > >
> >> > > Oh? Where?
> >> >
> >> > Bristol and bath, it's not ready yet... Got mailman setup today, but
> >> > still got to do the site, etc...
> >> Doesn't Bath.pm already exist? OK, it looks a bit moribund, judging by
> >> bath.pm.org and its mailing list.
> > Yes - bath.pm already exists - Lyle subscribed, we said hello.
> > Lyle ? If you're want to organise something, just email the existing
> > bath.pm list. How about just getting a few people together in the pub
> > for a drink and using the existing and working mailing list to
> > organise that.
> That's pretty much what's happening. Lyle has taken over control of
> Bath.pm (the previous leader had buggered off to Amsterdam!) and has
> also volunteered to resurrect the dormant Bristol.pm. He's planning to
> run them as a join Bath/Bristol group.
An email to the existing lists would seem both sensible and at polite
- quite why I heard about this through an offhand comment on london.pm
I don't know.
> Don't worry, the people behind pm.org are far too lazy (and I mean
> that in the nicest possible way) to start setting up new groups where
> ones already exist.
Seems a bit pointless creating a standalone mailing list outside of
the perl.org mailing lists that are listed and archived and well
LAMP System Integration, Development and Hosting
More information about the london.pm