Hosting again

Lyle - perl at
Mon Oct 29 19:40:24 GMT 2007

Alistair McGlinchy wrote:
> [*] I removed the disks issue as RAID5 provides cost effective resilience
> for a high MTBF component and with massive hassle reduction when they fail.
I've always used raid 10 or raid 1. In your experience should I be using 
raid 5?


More information about the mailing list