Hosting again

[Bob Walker]

On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Lyle - CosmicPerl.com wrote:

> Alistair McGlinchy wrote:
>> [*] I removed the disks issue as RAID5 provides cost effective resilience
>> for a high MTBF component and with massive hassle reduction when they fail.
>> 
> I've always used raid 10 or raid 1. In your experience should I be using raid 
> 5?

bob put son his sun fanboy hat.

you should be using sun hardware running solaris with zfs pools using 
RAIDZ.

-- 
Bob Walker
http://london.randomness.org.uk - http://tech.randomness.org.uk
http://rwc.randomness.org.uk    - http://londonjoinery.com
for great beery justice!        - meh! bah! indeeed!