bob at randomness.org.uk
Mon Oct 29 22:53:59 GMT 2007
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Lyle - CosmicPerl.com wrote:
> Alistair McGlinchy wrote:
>> [*] I removed the disks issue as RAID5 provides cost effective resilience
>> for a high MTBF component and with massive hassle reduction when they fail.
> I've always used raid 10 or raid 1. In your experience should I be using raid
bob put son his sun fanboy hat.
you should be using sun hardware running solaris with zfs pools using
http://london.randomness.org.uk - http://tech.randomness.org.uk
http://rwc.randomness.org.uk - http://londonjoinery.com
for great beery justice! - meh! bah! indeeed!
More information about the london.pm