Calling UNIVERSAL::can() as a function is allowed. (was: [OT] best way to determine existence of a function in a package)

chromatic chromatic at wgz.org
Wed Nov 21 21:29:24 GMT 2007

Previous message: Calling UNIVERSAL::can() as a function is allowed. (was: [OT] best way to determine existence of a function in a package)
Next message: Calling UNIVERSAL::can() as a function is allowed. (was: [OT] best way to determine existence of a function in a package)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wednesday 21 November 2007 11:17:07 Andy Wardley wrote:

> It says in the
> official documentation that UNIVERSAL::can *can* be called as a function.

Not anymore.

-- c

Previous message: Calling UNIVERSAL::can() as a function is allowed. (was: [OT] best way to determine existence of a function in a package)
Next message: Calling UNIVERSAL::can() as a function is allowed. (was: [OT] best way to determine existence of a function in a package)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the london.pm mailing list