Anti-cat device

Randy J. Ray rjray at
Fri Jan 4 00:11:08 GMT 2008

Paul Makepeace wrote:
> On 1/3/08, Randy J. Ray <rjray at> wrote:
>> Free oxygen (i.e., that part not bonded to dihydrogen) will gradually vacate
>> the premises.
> Right, I understand this from their webpage but they don't explain why
> this is (in their words) "healthful".
>> In addition, particulates (dust, dander, etc.) will also settle
>> on the surface.
> I could see that this would be a bit unappealing. That said, cats lick
> their own arses, and thirst is a strong driver, so I'm not sure
> particulates would necessarily slow 'em down _too_ much...

It's not so much a matter of better *for* them, as it is just more appealing.
Encourages them to stay better hydrated, rather than waiting until they too
thirsty to care what's floating around...

Randy J. Ray      Sunnyvale, CA   rjray at

Silicon Valley Scale Modelers:

More information about the mailing list