[OT] user-management bit of web apps
Aaron Trevena
aaron.trevena at gmail.com
Thu Jan 31 14:52:40 GMT 2008
On 31/01/2008, Jeff Anderson <captvanhalen at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Many folks on Londom.pm
> <london.pm at london.pm.org> wroted:
> > > > > The same probably applies to 80 or 90 per cent of the modules on CPAN,
> > > > > if not more.
> > > >
> > > > True. I don't know - may be you are right and we just have to accept
> > > > what Mike described as unevitable. Or maybe we should search for a
> > > > solution?
> > >
> > > I don't believe there is a real problem looking for a solution here.
> > >
> >
> > It sounded like it was a problem for Mike - and it is for me.
>
> Don't you feel the same way about the Internet in general? There is a
> lot of cruft in the CPAN (some of it mine), but if you really want to
> find the good stuff you will. Just don't let the path of least
> resistance lead you to the least.
Well there are a lot of tools to help you pick the right library or
tool from cpan :
cpanra(n)tings, rt.cpan, search.cpan.org will show the date/frequency
of release, number of bugs, number of cpan-tester fails, you can check
the kwalitee on the kwalitee site, or look at the recomended modules
list on the perl 5 wiki.
You could even ask on one of several perl beginner or specialisation
lists, or even your local perl monger list or meeting.
A.
--
http://www.aarontrevena.co.uk
LAMP System Integration, Development and Hosting
More information about the london.pm
mailing list