[OT] user-management bit of web apps
aaron.trevena at gmail.com
Thu Jan 31 14:52:40 GMT 2008
On 31/01/2008, Jeff Anderson <captvanhalen at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Many folks on Londom.pm
> <london.pm at london.pm.org> wroted:
> > > > > The same probably applies to 80 or 90 per cent of the modules on CPAN,
> > > > > if not more.
> > > >
> > > > True. I don't know - may be you are right and we just have to accept
> > > > what Mike described as unevitable. Or maybe we should search for a
> > > > solution?
> > >
> > > I don't believe there is a real problem looking for a solution here.
> > >
> > It sounded like it was a problem for Mike - and it is for me.
> Don't you feel the same way about the Internet in general? There is a
> lot of cruft in the CPAN (some of it mine), but if you really want to
> find the good stuff you will. Just don't let the path of least
> resistance lead you to the least.
Well there are a lot of tools to help you pick the right library or
tool from cpan :
cpanra(n)tings, rt.cpan, search.cpan.org will show the date/frequency
of release, number of bugs, number of cpan-tester fails, you can check
the kwalitee on the kwalitee site, or look at the recomended modules
list on the perl 5 wiki.
You could even ask on one of several perl beginner or specialisation
lists, or even your local perl monger list or meeting.
LAMP System Integration, Development and Hosting
More information about the london.pm