[OT] user-management bit of web apps

Aaron Trevena aaron.trevena at gmail.com
Thu Jan 31 14:52:40 GMT 2008


On 31/01/2008, Jeff Anderson <captvanhalen at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Many folks on Londom.pm
> <london.pm at london.pm.org> wroted:
> >  > > > The same probably applies to 80 or 90 per cent of the modules on CPAN,
> >  > > > if not more.
> >  > >
> >  > > True.  I don't know - may be you are right and we just have to accept
> >  > > what Mike described as unevitable.  Or maybe we should search for a
> >  > > solution?
> >  >
> >  > I don't believe there is a real problem looking for a solution here.
> >  >
> >
> >  It sounded like it was a problem for Mike - and it is for me.
>
> Don't you feel the same way about the Internet in general? There is a
> lot of cruft in the CPAN (some of it mine), but if you really want to
> find the good stuff you will. Just don't let the path of least
> resistance lead you to the least.

Well there are a lot of tools to help you pick the right library or
tool from cpan :
cpanra(n)tings, rt.cpan, search.cpan.org will show the date/frequency
of release, number of bugs, number of cpan-tester fails, you can check
the kwalitee on the kwalitee site, or look at the recomended modules
list on the perl 5 wiki.

You could even ask on one of several perl beginner or specialisation
lists, or even your local perl monger list or meeting.

A.

-- 
http://www.aarontrevena.co.uk
LAMP System Integration, Development and Hosting


More information about the london.pm mailing list