Who fancies some Cock?

[Peter Corlett]

On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 08:03:11AM +0100, Jacqui Caren wrote:
[...]
> p.s. I wonder how many SA installs this would be rejected under.

It got through mine OK, and it's rather aggressive:

X-Spam-Hammy-Tokens: 0.000-+--HTo:D*org, 0.000-+--HPrecedence:list,
        0.000-+--H*u:1.5.17, 0.000-+--H*UA:1.5.17, 0.000-+--H*r:abuse
X-Spam-Bayes-Score: 0.0679
X-Spam-Spammy-Tokens: 0.999-2--cock, 0.998-1--Cock, 0.995-1--H*M:cabal,
        0.987-1--breakfast, 0.971-6--sum
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on mx-1.cabal.org.uk
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,RDNS_NONE
        autolearn=no version=3.2.4
X-Spam-Score-Description:
        * -0.7 BAYES_20 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 5 to 20%
        *      [score: 0.0679]
        *  0.1 RDNS_NONE Delivered to trusted network by a host with no rDNS
        * -0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

I note that "sum" is a spam indicator, which seems a bit unfair on dim sum.