MVC (Re: DBIx::Class - Related Tables)
abw at wardley.org
Tue Oct 7 14:11:04 BST 2008
Raphael Mankin wrote:
> If there were many such IF statements in my templates I would tend to
> use separate templates for the user states (or whatever) and let the
> controller route to the appropriate one.
Sure, but this could be the site/login template, included from the
site/sidebar which got pulled in by the site/layout template, and so
on. It's probably just one of many different template fragments that
render parts of the UI chrome and have little or nothing to do with the
application-specific functionality of any particular URL/page/handler.
For my controller to make these decisions would require it to know a lot
more detail about how I've structured my templates than I would be comfortable
That's not to say that there aren't times when it's the right thing for
the controller to influence the presentation, as long as it can do so
relatively cleanly. For example, an application controller
might change the INCLUDE_PATH of a template engine to add one or more
template directories, so that the user/status template gets magically
selected from the right directory, either templates/user/logged_in or
templates/user/admin, for example.
However, that does tend to cement the presentation architecture and
application server quite tightly together. Of course, that may be
*exactly* what you need for a particular application (delivering
mobile content via handset-specific view objects comes to mind as a
recent example of this), but that doesn't mean it's always the best
I totally agree that the application controller should decide about
selecting the right template based on the task that it has just performed
(e.g. displaying the login/failed.html or login/success.html template),
but in this case we're talking about the various presentation aspects
that aren't necessarily the responsibility of any particular controller
or single part of the application.
More information about the london.pm