Perl's lack of 'in' keyword
david at cantrell.org.uk
Wed Oct 8 12:56:41 BST 2008
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 09:57:38PM +0100, Iain Barnett wrote:
> I agree with both your points, but that also doesn't invalidate the
> point that perl might benefit from less "line noisy" syntax at times,
> just as ~~ doesn't necessarily obviate the need for an "in" operator.
> The smart match does look good though.
Smart-match smells too much of DWIMmery for me to be comfortable with
David Cantrell | Official London Perl Mongers Bad Influence
What a lovely day! Now watch me spoil it for you.
More information about the london.pm