Perl's lack of 'in' keyword

[IvorW]

Andy Armstrong wrote:
> * Replies will be sent through Spamex to andy at hexten.net
> * For additional info click -> http://www.spamex.com/i/?v=28377196
>
> DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08)
> X-BeenThere: london.pm at london.pm.org
> X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6
> Precedence: list
> Reply-To: "London.pm Perl M\[ou\]ngers" <london.pm at london.pm.org>
> List-Id: "London.pm Perl M\[ou\]ngers" <london.pm.london.pm.org>
> List-Unsubscribe: <http://london.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/london.pm>,
> <mailto:london.pm-request at london.pm.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> List-Archive: <http://london.pm.org/pipermail/london.pm>
> List-Post: <mailto:london.pm at london.pm.org>
> List-Help: <mailto:london.pm-request at london.pm.org?subject=help>
> List-Subscribe: <http://london.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/london.pm>,
> <mailto:london.pm-request at london.pm.org?subject=subscribe>
> Sender: london.pm-bounces at london.pm.org
> Errors-To: london.pm-bounces at london.pm.org
>
> On 10 Oct 2008, at 01:18, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
>> On 9 Oct 2008, at 19:18, Iain Barnett wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I can only conclude your fibbing
>>
>> You're.
>>
>> You lose. You get to keep PHP.
>
>
> Nah, he's just systematically stripping all that unfriendly
> punctuation out of English.

No, he's stated he is capable of drawing the threads of your lies to a
conclusion, but nothing more.