Perl is dead
zzbbyy at gmail.com
Thu Dec 4 11:31:58 GMT 2008
Guilty of starting a similar discussion thread in the past I feel
entitled to ask - what positive outcome would you expect from this
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Ovid <publiustemp-londonpm at yahoo.com> wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Dave Hodgkinson <davehodg at gmail.com>
>> >> In response to Ovid's post on use.perl:
>> >> http://davehodg.blogspot.com/2008/12/perl-is-dead.html
>> > Is there really no Ruby or Python on that list?
>> There weren't on the original list. Fixed.
>> Perl at least kicks the ass of the upstarts.
> Until you look at a graph of relative job growth. For Ruby, Perl, PHP and Python, they're all trending up. We're flat.
> Buy the book - http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/perlhks/
> Tech blog - http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/
> Twitter - http://twitter.com/OvidPerl
> Official Perl 6 Wiki - http://www.perlfoundation.org/perl6
More information about the london.pm