Perl Christmas Quiz
tla at mit.edu
Fri Dec 12 16:48:20 GMT 2008
What the hell, since we've spent the last few days arguing with each
other about our (and Perl's) image to newcomers:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Paul Makepeace <paulm at paulm.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Robin Berjon <robin at berjon.com> wrote:
>> On Dec 12, 2008, at 13:56 , Paul Makepeace wrote:
>>> Do not apply for a job with that code :-)
>> Not that I'm hiring or that I can't see issues with the code above, but the
>> guy did state he had "baby perl" and then posted his proposed solution to a
>> list famous for being full of Perl luminaries. Curiosity, guts, willingness
>> to learn — that's a CV I'd look at.
> Fair enough, and not the place to make comments. I think I've just had
> one too many interview candidates in recent memory who have named
> their functions "func" and used variable names like "foo", "bar", etc.
> Free interviewer's hint: DO NOT DO THIS.
> P, who does his best to objectively review the rest of the candidate's
> efforts, but by god, it can be hard sometimes...
The one-line put-down wasn't really very helpful in letting Fahad know
what was wrong with his code; it was just an assertion that you are
smarter than he is. It took another prod to get any actual
*constructive* criticism, even with the obvious "baby perl" tag that
said "I'd like to learn to do this better". This is what bothers me
about the attitudes here sometimes.
More information about the london.pm