SHA question

[Dan Rowles]

Dermot wrote:
[snip]
> Incident I get poor results from the MD5 compared with SHA so I can't
> relie on MD5 for
>
> MD5 (md5_base64) results:
> mr_485_htu_AST.pdf   116caa6cc1705db23a36feb11c8c4113 32
> MR_2891.pdf          01f73c142dae9f9f403bbab543b6aa6f 32
> duplicate.pdf         01f73c142dae9f9f403bbab543b6aa6f 32
> MR_2898.pdf          01f73c142dae9f9f403bbab543b6aa6f 32
> PR_A02.pdf           5552e6587357f9967dc0bc83153cca63 32
> mr_485_htu_hrt.pdf   116caa6cc1705db23a36feb11c8c4113 32
> PR_A01.pdf           5552e6587357f9967dc0bc83153cca63 32
>
>   
I think you must have a bug. Finding three MD5 collisions in seven files 
that are actually different to each other would be a really remarkable 
result....

Dan