On 16 April 2010 14:44, David Cantrell <david at cantrell.org.uk> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 12:06:43PM +0100, Victoria Conlan wrote: > >> I don't know about anyone else here, but the only reason I would ever ask >> that question would be to turn down anyone who claimed to know more than 3. > > Those three being 2, 2 and 7? :-) No, just 3 ;) -- Jasper