lovefilm - spamming f-tards or decent employer?
rlippan at remotelinux.com
Fri Dec 23 18:15:29 GMT 2011
On Friday, December 23, 2011 at 10:53:40 AM, Sue Spence wrote:
> So far it's just one person. I believe you mentioned that you were
One person, who accused them of being 'spamming f-tards'. I have not seen any
of this spam myself.
I would like to see the headers, and I am still waiting for answers to my
question about whether the SPF/DKIM/Domain Keys stuff checked out.
> looking for a job in London, but the topic drift you're attempting to
> commit here is not cool.
Nope, I am *not* looking for a job in London, nor am I attempting to drift
the conversation in the way you are implying. See above.
Perhaps your impression is colored by earlier events. I intended nothing more
WRT the question posed in the subject, 1) did <company> *really* say that about
a hired third party? And 2) *IF* so, it is strongly indicative of <company>
not being a "decent employer" because....
Or, more plainly yet, to answer the question, "can 'spamming f-tards' be
Again, the origin of the spam is still in question....
More information about the london.pm