davehodg at gmail.com
Fri Apr 20 17:15:29 BST 2012
Or use a proper parser?
On 20 Apr 2012, at 16:41, Andy Armstrong wrote:
> On 20 Apr 2012, at 16:29, Simon Wistow wrote:
>> (?::(\w+) \s+)? # optional label
>> ([A-Za-z]+) \s+ # opcode
>> ([^,\s]+) (?:, \s+ # operand
>> ([^,\s]+))* \s* # optional second opcode
> You don't get a distinct capture for each application of the pattern - so the third operand overwrites the second. Maybe put the * inside the parens and then parse the list of operands in a second step?
> Andy Armstrong, Hexten
More information about the london.pm