essuu at ourshack.com
Wed May 2 13:16:53 BST 2012
On 02/05/2012 12:32, Simon Wilcox wrote:
> On 02/05/2012 00:04, Dirk Koopman wrote:
>> The problem with PI is that you have to have it when the punter makes
>> the claim, not (just) when you did the work. Which means that if the
>> BBC (just talking very hypothetically) wants to sue three years after
>> you left them, and you have no PI in force, then you could be stuffed.
> You can get what the insurance industry calls run-on insurance to
> cover you for claims arising from past work. It's relatively cheap if
> you're no longer contracting.
It's run-off insurance, not run-on. I was only looking at this the other
More information about the london.pm