Living with smart match breakage
davehodg at gmail.com
Fri Jun 14 09:40:33 BST 2013
A lot of? Are people really using this in production code now?
Sent from my iPhone
On 14 Jun 2013, at 09:32, jason <jason at ukfsn.org> wrote:
> On 2013-06-14 09:11, Smylers wrote:
>> There isn't such a list -- its "experimental" nature means anything
>> might change. P5P doesn't have consensus, and no decision has been made
>> on what's going to happen.
>> There are some on P5P suggesting that smartmatch is so broken it should
>> be removed entirely.
> That was the impression I got from the sparse details in the 5.18 announcement and what worried me more than anything else was precisely that uncertainty.
> That there is no consensus that at least some of smart match and thus, given/when, can be considered non-experimental (and thus safe to use in production) means that a lot of application and library code may have to be rewritten at some point but nobody is really able to definitively determine what the scale of that risk is.
> Certainly we can continue to declare use experimental and things will continue to work but that is a risky strategy.
More information about the london.pm