Regex lookahead example not as stated in Camel 4th

Tom Hukins tom at
Wed Jun 19 15:17:12 BST 2013

On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 03:02:32PM +0100, gvim wrote:
> On 19/06/13 14:52, Abigail wrote:
> > That's not a lookahead assertion.
> So there's a typo on p.248

Yes, and it's listed in the errata on the publisher's Web site:


More information about the mailing list