Regex lookahead example not as stated in Camel 4th

Tom Hukins tom at eborcom.com
Wed Jun 19 15:17:12 BST 2013


On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 03:02:32PM +0100, gvim wrote:
> On 19/06/13 14:52, Abigail wrote:
> 
> > That's not a lookahead assertion.
> 
> So there's a typo on p.248

Yes, and it's listed in the errata on the publisher's Web site:
http://oreilly.com/catalog/errata.csp?isbn=9780596004927

Tom


More information about the london.pm mailing list