F*king sorbs

[Matt Sergeant]

On 7-Feb-06, at 4:43 AM, Jacqui Caren wrote:

> Sigh,
>
> It looks like our static IP range from BT is now defined as a  
> dynamic IP range by sorbs - a check of other static IP provided by  
> BT shows a similar SORBS entry :[
>
> Anyone here had any dealing with the owner?
>
> Evidently BT have to contact them to get the IP range 'cleared' - as
> anyone who has dealt with BT knows, this does not happen right  
> away :-)

I know Matthew and the other SORBS deputies. They've been trying to  
get really aggressive on dynamic IP space lately, trying to force the  
hand with decent rDNS naming (a noble goal) for dynamic vs static  
assignments. Give me some more details (offlist if you like) and I'll  
see what I can find out.

Matt.

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________