F*king sorbs

[David Hodgkinson]

On 7 Feb 2006, at 16:23, Matt Sergeant wrote:

> On 7-Feb-06, at 4:43 AM, Jacqui Caren wrote:
>
>> Sigh,
>>
>> It looks like our static IP range from BT is now defined as a  
>> dynamic IP range by sorbs - a check of other static IP provided by  
>> BT shows a similar SORBS entry :[
>>
>> Anyone here had any dealing with the owner?
>>
>> Evidently BT have to contact them to get the IP range 'cleared' - as
>> anyone who has dealt with BT knows, this does not happen right  
>> away :-)
>
> I know Matthew and the other SORBS deputies. They've been trying to  
> get really aggressive on dynamic IP space lately, trying to force  
> the hand with decent rDNS naming (a noble goal) for dynamic vs  
> static assignments. Give me some more details (offlist if you like)  
> and I'll see what I can find out.

This has caused pain to someone I know too. Same situation,  
"business" BT, static ADSL
getting blackholed.