Virgin.net scam

[David Hodgkinson]

On 1 Mar 2006, at 09:48, Simon Wilcox wrote:
> Check your T&Cs, running websites is probably not allowed. Anyway,  
> running
> websites on a 256k upstream pipe seems a bit silly. Surely a  
> Bytemark VM
> or similar would be a better option ?

Or dreamhost. I appear to have a 1TB allocation of bandwidth[0]  
available
there at the moment.

[0] OK, bandwidth is really stuff/second. Maybe total data should be
"bandlength"?