Non Sucking YAML parser

[Matt Sergeant]

Dirk Koopman wrote:
> I suspect he has the same problems with xml as many of us: 
> 
> * the signal to noise ratio of xml is way too low.

Because of end tags?

> * the perl xml toolsets tend to be very large and not that quick.

Seem to be significantly faster than YAML toolsets. I would also expect 
them to be smaller given the relative sizes of the specs (the YAML spec 
is about 3 times longer than the XML spec IIRC).

> * the perl xml toolsets are not completely reliable.
> * and then there are the interfaces....

Suggestions would be interesting. There have been lots of things tried, 
and there's probably something on CPAN that would match your hopes.

Matt.

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________