Even worse (was Re: Google Code Search)

[Andrew Beattie]

Robert Rothenberg wrote:
> On 06/10/06 09:51 Paul Orrock wrote:
>
>   
>> There are some really worrying ones in this lot :
>>
>> http://www.google.com/codesearch?hl=en&lr=&q=%22this+is+a+hack%22&btnG=Search
>>     
>
> http://www.google.com/codesearch?hl=en&lr=&q=%22this+should+not+work%22&btnG=Search
>
> http://www.google.com/codesearch?hl=en&lr=&q=%22why+does+this+work%22&btnG=Search
>
> http://www.google.com/codesearch?hl=en&lr=&q=%22this+is+wrong%22&btnG=Search
>
> http://www.google.com/codesearch?hl=en&lr=&q=%22this+is+broken%22&btnG=Search
>
> http://www.google.com/codesearch?hl=en&lr=&q=%22this+is+dangerous%22&btnG=Search
>
>   
57,200 hits for this:

http://www.google.com/codesearch?hl=en&lr=&q=%22there+be+dragons+here%22&btnG=Search

Andrew