Even worse (was Re: Google Code Search)

[Danny Staple]

On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 15:15 +0100, Andrew Beattie wrote:
> Robert Rothenberg wrote:
> > On 06/10/06 09:51 Paul Orrock wrote:
> >
> >   
> >> There are some really worrying ones in this lot :
> >>
> >> http://www.google.com/codesearch?hl=en&lr=&q=%22this+is+a+hack%22&btnG=Search
> >>     
> >
> > http://www.google.com/codesearch?hl=en&lr=&q=%22this+should+not+work%22&btnG=Search
> >
> > http://www.google.com/codesearch?hl=en&lr=&q=%22why+does+this+work%22&btnG=Search
> >
> > http://www.google.com/codesearch?hl=en&lr=&q=%22this+is+wrong%22&btnG=Search
> >
> > http://www.google.com/codesearch?hl=en&lr=&q=%22this+is+broken%22&btnG=Search
> >
> > http://www.google.com/codesearch?hl=en&lr=&q=%22this+is+dangerous%22&btnG=Search
> >
> >   
> 57,200 hits for this:
> 
> http://www.google.com/codesearch?hl=en&lr=&q=%22there+be+dragons+here%22&btnG=Search
> 
> Andrew
A classic, note that mod_perl is on the first page... 179,000 hits. Why
are profanities the first thing that came to mind...

http://www.google.com/codesearch?hl=en&lr=&q=%22bloody+hell%
22&btnG=Search

This is a giggle (maybe someone here needs therapy):

http://www.google.com/codesearch?q=+%22shit%22
+show:VozEBKHbCLA:wB53zwDzOSg:Y_o6Gyc1W3o&sa=N&cd=10&ct=rc&cs_p=http://gentoo.osuosl.org/distfiles/emech-3.0.2.tar.gz&cs_f=emech-3.0.2/src/shit.c#a0

It may actually be "s - hit"

Talking of anger management: 
http://www.google.com/codesearch?hl=en&lr=&q=%22I+hate+%22&btnG=Search

http://www.google.com/codesearch?hl=en&lr=&q=%22WTF%3F%22&btnG=Search

Hmm - this has some potential for fun until the novelty wears off..

Danny
-- 
Danny Staple MBCS
OrionRobots
http://orionrobots.co.uk/blogs/dannystaple
(Full contact details available through website)