Why Perl needs a .sig like Kibo's

[John Costello]

On Fri, 7 Sep 2007, Andy Wardley wrote:
> You'll have to forgive me. I have a memory like a... like a... what are those 
> things you drain rice in? What am I talking about?  (DNA++)

Oh, don't think I'll fall for that old trick!
 
> I was right first time, I have a Kibo *Love* Number of 1.  But that's 
> more-or-less the same thing as a regular Kibo Number of 1/2 when you account 
> for the relatavistic component.  It never pays to forget the relativistic 
> component when travelling so close to the speed of Kibo.

I can believe that about the Love Number, and the relatavistic effects are 
well known.

I find it interesting that Google Groups does not contain any posts for 
alt.religion.kibology from November of 1991.