introspection (and Perl 6)
jon at jrock.us
Mon Jan 21 21:40:09 GMT 2008
On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 21:04 +0000, Aaron Trevena wrote:
> On 21/01/2008, Ovid <publiustemp-londonpm at yahoo.com> wrote:
> actually shorthand for:
> > $class.HOW.can('foo');
> Kinda neat. :)
> I don't mind the hat as long as it's shorthand for golfers that I'll
> never need to use or read in production code.
Why is shorthand "only for golfers"? Do you really think that
Java-style verbosity makes for more readable code? Both expressions
mean the same thing, and are equally readable.
Yes, you need to know Perl in order to read Perl.
Am I really having this conversation on a pm.org mailing list?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://london.pm.org/pipermail/london.pm/attachments/20080121/75b7a37b/attachment.pgp
More information about the london.pm