introspection (and Perl 6)
davehodg at gmail.com
Mon Jan 21 22:36:39 GMT 2008
On 21 Jan 2008, at 22:40, Jonathan Rockway wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 21:04 +0000, Aaron Trevena wrote:
>> On 21/01/2008, Ovid <publiustemp-londonpm at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> actually shorthand for:
>> Kinda neat. :)
>> I don't mind the hat as long as it's shorthand for golfers that I'll
>> never need to use or read in production code.
> Why is shorthand "only for golfers"? Do you really think that
> Java-style verbosity makes for more readable code? Both expressions
> mean the same thing, and are equally readable.
> Yes, you need to know Perl in order to read Perl.
> Am I really having this conversation on a pm.org mailing list?
Turn it around. Give me a recipe where these fairways and bunkers are
in the real world.
Back in the Market Risk swamp
More information about the london.pm