introspection (and Perl 6)
zzbbyy at gmail.com
Tue Jan 22 10:18:11 GMT 2008
On Jan 22, 2008 11:01 AM, Ovid <publiustemp-londonpm at yahoo.com> wrote:
> --- Aaron Trevena <aaron.trevena at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Is it really worth replacing a 3 letter self-explainatory method name
> > with a hat symbol - particularly given in most code scenario's thats
> > a saving of 2 characters out at least 20.
> Depends on what you do. If you only call on the metaobject once in a
> while, no big deal, but if you write as much introspective code as I
> do, that little hat symbol will be a blessing.
> In short, if it doesn't suit your needs, don't use it :) It will
> certainly suit mine.
The question is if it will suit the person that reads your code.
More information about the london.pm