Most Perl 6 will look like Perl 5
nick at ccl4.org
Wed Jan 30 16:53:14 GMT 2008
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 11:38:55AM -0500, Jeff Anderson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 11:27 AM, jesse <jesse at fsck.com> wrote:
> > So, what have _you_ done to help Perl 6 get done sooner?
> Not a damn thing since i heard the news that -> became . and . became _
> I'd rather learn a new language if i am going to have to learn a new language.
> Hopefully Perl 7 will be a proper predecessor to Perl 5. I don't know
I assume you mean successor.
> what the hell happened to Perl 6. Oh wait, that's right. No backward
I'm not aware of anyone writing a Perl 7.
On that basis alone, Perl 6 seems more likely to arrive.
> Again, why not just switch to Ruby or Python?
Nothing stopping you. But nothing stopping you sticking with Perl 5 either.
Whatever floats your boat.
More information about the london.pm